|
Post by 519 Sniperz on Jan 11, 2013 18:08:18 GMT -5
hey guys dunno if anyone else wanted to comment on them but i figured i might as well start a thread.
I'm in favor of trading dispersal picks for sure, but it's not the end of the world if we can't. I like the ability to shape my team from the get go, but understand the flip side to it as well that the commish has brought up. I'm probably like 60/40 on the idea in favor of being able to trade. It worked well in the last draft i was in like that.
|
|
|
Post by SKA Letangs on Jan 11, 2013 19:12:02 GMT -5
I'm against it. In every league I've been in, it's offset the balance off the jump. That's just me, so I vote no.
|
|
Dusty
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by Dusty on Jan 11, 2013 21:47:02 GMT -5
As the commish, the balance is important to me, but it also slows things down sooooo much. The draft will take twice as long.
|
|
|
Post by 519 Sniperz on Jan 11, 2013 23:27:13 GMT -5
yeah now that i think about it, it really does slow it down a ton... and we are 8 days out from the start of the season too
|
|
|
Post by Monroeville Zombies on Jan 13, 2013 1:49:14 GMT -5
I have never done a slow draft before and I think trading picks for will only complicate it for me. Either way is fine, I'm not really adamant about it. If we do, I'll probably just keep my picks to myself
|
|
|
Post by 519 Sniperz on Jan 13, 2013 3:22:42 GMT -5
just thinking here, obviously not my call, but most slow drafts ive been in are slow for the reason mainly to trade... if thats the principle why not do a fast or "faster" draft. I get the time in between picks helps to research too tho. 29 rd... we could do 14 on say monday and 15 on wednesday? break in between, still do them on the board here but make sure everyone stays on for a few hours each day so its faster. just an idea to think on.
|
|